Money Tip Of The Day – Money Saving Tips

The world needs to go green, LEED and Green must go

The world needs to go green, LEED and Green must go

In the last decade, the idea of ??building “green” has sprouted in the world – the so- called “green revolution”. Over the years, we could see the revolution gradually turning into one of these temporary trends established to support the marketing of construction related fields. Today, “green” the term is certainly misused and misunderstood by most of the empire of genius.

Actually, natural living systems on our planet are the models that we know who are triumphant in their sustainability as they relate to the environment in the process holistic, integrated, and reductive. On the contrary, many of the existing LEED rating systems as building are structured to support solutions that are mainly additive consumption and encourage conservation. This is simply because the rating systems are initially designed to keep certain items that meet the sustainability which are then packed with the technologies, systems and products to get there. Designers now rely heavily on these systems intelligent services to compensate for their negligence in the design of base-building. If buildings are based on a design process slow, it would obviously be stretched to use the so-called “Green” or “smart” engineering methods to supplement it.

It is unfortunate that the value of rating systems like LEED are converted into an accounting period architecture. This has completely deviated from what could be a healthy exercise by going out with a really good architecture. We’re missing an opportunity to develop such an architecture allowing accountants or statistical procedures to dominate our logical thinking and creativity. Targeting the maximum LEED points especially in the GCC countries require more common sense and understanding of the effect. The potential benefits of achieving a single certification should not be the motive of the design process.

cycling advocacy or trying to invest in a rainwater harvesting system in the Middle East are examples. inexperienced people using LEED does not realize that consideration of the GCC countries is a waste of wealth, effort and energy given the facts before us. Let me explain. In trying to collect what little rain we receive in the Middle East, we do not collect water in fact. It turns into a scenario to collect mud, dirt, contaminated water. This water then requires further treatment for reuse – simply meaning you have to use chemicals and appropriate systems to treat it, requires one to spend money for this treatment system, more water is essential, while washing the filters, electricity is needed to run the pump and trained personnel to maintain the tanks. In short, it is an endless pain. Although it may fetch you extra points in the LEED ratings, the initiative as a whole if the analysis is a waste.

Even

implementing large-scale solar technologies are driven to extreme risk because of the amount of dust in the atmosphere and the sunlight lasts – two factors that reduce the effectiveness predominant solar cells. Recently, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia has been declared between the worlds top green buildings. If there is one issue that must be appreciated, I hope they have found a solution for the free energy at no cost to maintain all the solar cells cool and dust-free, to manage their proposed roof panels and wind turbines Solar energy for all the years to come. People in the Middle East can only imagine and estimate how much money, water, energy and efforts are required to keep all the solar panels and glass surfaces covered with any suitable buildings – each year . The statistics are staggering.

I also wonder why the majority of LEED credits are weighted equally, when it is perfectly clear that some issues have greater environmental benefits than others. “Why should I install the HVAC effective for some extra points when I could get the same points by adding a few bikes in the college campus?” Asked an architect. Although installing efficient HVAC system would save an enormous amount of energy and add value to the environment on a massive scale, according to the LEED rating system – it is equal to the idea of ??having bike racks on campus education. The solution is here to make a careful study of all votes criticism that add higher value of the environment and make them mandatory. Then, the set of points that can be done by professionals in the credits low.

It is a fact that the development and construction of green buildings and sustainable cost more initially than a conventional building. It’s irrefutable. Practically, in addition to this cost, all procedures related to LEED certification will add another 1% – 4%. I do not know why the design consultants who are breaking their heads with false reports and statistics to show customers otherwise. The hidden costs appear at the end of account that the steps towards completion of the project and cause havoc customers. Let us have the courage to recognize that they are more expensive and are definitely worth it.

Somewhere along the line , organizations such as USGBC realized they could capitalize on the LEED system. The organization has no doubt he has made known worldwide, compared with other scoring systems such as Greenstar (AUST) and BREEAM ( UK). USGBC charges high fees for the commissioning and even to become a LEED accredited professional. Fees try this test is about U.S. 0. Yes, if one fails another 0 must be disbursed. In my opinion, if the organization is truly concerned about the environment and making green buildings worldwide, they should make it affordable. In addition, LEED AP is converted into the profession an “elite” – gradually threatening the importance of trained professionals in the fields of architecture and engineering. I have to wonder about the significance of paying for this test and that all LEED AP – return to reference LEED new textbooks, while managing all aspects of commissioning or project. Any professional can manage and view the manual in case of need, then why have this system of expensive tests and unnecessary in the first place? orientation modules and training programs would be more than sufficient in this regard.

Instead of converting the commissioning and certification in a technocratic exercise, the procedures should be more involved and also include a subjective approach. Points should be awarded for innovative approaches that are not included, or coordination of value in the manual LEED. USGBC professionals, I suppose, are sufficiently trained to make such judgments and subjective decisions fluent . The manual LEED should be treated as a guide only.

Instead of judging the buildings LEED AP only on paper and electronic representations of media – regular visits to analyze the project sites, the inspection of materials and products should also be conducted. Clients and consultants to pay big bucks and spend the effort to implement LEED and fair analysis of a project by using simple materials submitted by courier or e-media, does not justify the whole system of USGBC to all. Decisions can be taken on the project sites through discussion with clients, design consultants and <-! NextPage -> contractors collectively. This is how innovative and fresh LEED may itself be evolving, rather than just being a socialite compiled data on which buildings are evaluated

.

Finally, manuals rating systems should not be used as encyclopedias of green and sustainable design. The architects and engineers must have extensive knowledge on the analysis of climatic data and geography, the study of levels of comfort rights, including passive design techniques, the judicious use of materials and resources and integrate services more efficient building. Those principles should guide our design process. Determine whether a building is classified as green or is not one of the smaller issues that we finally face the end of a project. A scoring system such as LEED, BREEAM, if necessary, can serve as a checklist or a useful means of returning alternatives to our evolving concepts.

The world needs green buildings a lot more green buildings need LEED certification. If certifications such as LEED, BREEAM continue to cost too much money time and effort – we will not stop building green projects, we’ll just stop certifying them

.

More Green Investing Articles